Hellraiser (1987)I've got to confess I was never a huge fan of the Hellraiser films. I had a friend as a teenager who loved them and made me a copy of the first four (on one VHS tape!) in the hopes of making me a fan too. At the time, I was massively freaked out by horror films and I remember watching them in 10 minute installments to make sure I didn't get too scared (Note: I've since manned up significantly). Anyway, I remember thinking they were okay but alternated between being ridiculously over-the-top and ploddingly dull. Fast forward several years and it turns out they've made nine of these films! So I thought the time was ripe to give them another go and watch them all from the beginning. Surely, if they made nine entries there must have been something I missed? No?
So the first film
sees
Andrew Robinson and Clare Higgins play Larry and Julia, a middle aged
couple who move into an old house with their daughter Kirsty. The house
used to belong to Larry's brother Frank and everyone assumes that he has
either died or gone missing. But the truth is far darker. You see Frank
was a thrill seeker and picked up an ancient puzzle box while he was on
his travels. He brought it back to his house and managed to solve the
puzzle, however by solving the box it opened a portal to another
dimension and a bunch of sado-masochistic beings called Cenobites tore
his body (and soul) apart! After Larry
accidentally cuts his
hand and bleeds on the floor where this all happened Frank starts to be
reanimated and he forces Julia, who he had an affair with long ago, to
get him more blood so he can become whole again.Hellraiser is actually adapted from Barker's own novella 'The Hellbound Heart' that he wrote in 1986. The storyline of the film is actually quite strong (far greater than any other entry in the series) and you can tell it's been adapted from a book. This isn't just a silly gore movie, there's some thought-provoking themes in the background. Barker's clearly trying to draw parallels between the sado-masochistic Cenobites and Julia's destructive (and submissive) affair with Frank. The part where a partially reanimated Frank forces Julia to lure several lonely businessmen back to her house and kill them is creepy not for the gory deaths but for how easily Julia agrees to do it. It's the lengths that she'll go for Frank (and the controlling influence that Frank has over her) that are most disturbing elements of the film.
Considering Hellraiser
was Barker's first time directing a film he did a pretty solid job. I
only really had two issues with the whole film. The first was that the
violence and gore is quite frequent and brightly lit and I cant help but
feel that if he implied instead of showing, the film might have
achieved a truly terrifying atmosphere. The second was the finale where
the Cenobites, having claimed Frank's soul, start inexplicably going
after Kirsty (something which doesn't happen in the book), not only felt
a contrived way to give the film an action-packed ending but it also
contained some shoddy effects that really take you out of the film. The
thing is Barker's writing is known for his long graphic descriptions but
I don't think it works to always just translate them direct to
screen. The mediums are very different and need handling in different
ways.The best part of the film is definitely Doug Bradley's portrayal of the lead Cenobite, Pinhead. He's a truly iconic cinematic monster. So weird, so bizarre, so creepy. Surprisingly, given that he's the only character on the film's poster, Pinhead is actually used very sparingly in the film and has only handful of lines. However each appearance and each line of dialogue is expertly delivered by Bradley. There's very few actors who could pull off a line like "We'll tear your soul apart." In fact all of the Cenobites are really well-realised. The lack of explanation of who they are and why they are linked to the box only add to the film's intrigue.
The acting
by the human
characters varies a bit. Clare Higgins does a great job of Julia. She's
really the lynch pin of the film and succeeds in slowing shifting the
character from innocent housewife to cold hearted
murderer. Ashley Lawrence is okay as Kirsty. Her character, even in the
book, seems to purely be there to solve the mystery so there's not a
whole lot for Lawrence to do with the role but scream and act shocked.
Andrew Robinson turns in a bit of a hammy performance as Larry. I think
that's because Robinson is far better at playing villains (see: Dirty Harry)
and he's hampered for the most part having to play Larry as such a nice
guy. However when the final twist comes and Frank dons his skin to
trick Kirsty we get a great 10 minutes. All in all Hellraiser is still a very good film that deserves it's iconic status. It's a not a perfect film by any means but it's an important entry in the horror genre. The dated special effects have somewhat diminished it's power but some of the practical gore will never be topped. The shot of Frank reanimated was stunning and once you see that final shot of Larry/Frank getting pulled apart by hooks you'll never forget it!
GRADE: A-
Hellbound: Hellraiser II (1988)Hellraiser was a smash hit at the box office and it was inevitable that sequel would happen but I'm surprised they turned one around so quickly. Barker stepped down from the directing chair and made way for Tony Randel, who would go on to do the live action anime Fist of the North Star in 1995. In a lot of ways the directing doesn't feel that different from the Barker's style, the only difference is the film seems even more stylised (and divorced from reality) than the previous entry - with an abundance of cheap set work that at times threatens to derail any sense of terror.
The
story of Hellbound picks
up directly from the previous film with Kirsty being questioned by
police a few days later. She has been assigned to a mental asylum and
though she tries to explain about the Cenobites and the puzzle box,
no one believes her because the only evidence left behind was a bloody
mattress. Unbeknownst to her, the head of the asylum, Dr Channard (a
devilish Kenneth Cranham) actually does know about the box and he has
been secretly been researching it for years. He ends up using a autistic
patient, Tiffany, to open the box
and, in doing so, resurrects Julia. Together they use the box to slip
into the Cenobites realm (aka Hell) and Kirsty follows hoping to find
her father.As mentioned the film is much larger in scope than the previous film; we're no longer confined to a small house. The characters travel to Hell itself - which resembles... a large maze of corridors! It's kind of a let down and worked much better in the first film where the Cenobites just appeared out of nowhere. One of the problems with Hellbound (and the series as a whole) is that the makers consistently went out of there way to explain things too much. I don't think we really needed to know that Pinhead used to be a WWI soldier. I don't think we needed to see what Hell looked like. I don't think we needed to know that Hell was ruled over by a floating rhombus called Leviathan. The more we see and the more explanations we get the less scary something becomes.
The major character
addition to the film is Dr Channard who is one of the best elements of
the film. British actor Kenneth Cranham excels in the role and is very
creepy both before and after he gets turned into a Cenobite. Like the
first film, it's his obsession with the box (which admittedly is rather
poorly introduced) that makes him a truly terrifying villain. I defy you
not to get chills when he exclaims, just before being transformed, "I
want to see. I want to know." Unfortunately, towards the end he has to
try and pull off silly one liners like "The doctor is IN" which don't
work out so well. And the less said about his final 'battle' with
Pinhead the better. Having made Pinhead such a powerful character in the
first film it was a shame to see him turn back to being human and help
Kirsty!It's always been a popular thing with horror sequels to pick up directly from the last installment (see: Friday the 13th, Halloween) but I can't help but feel that it wasn't necessary for Hellbound to bring Kirsty and everyone else back. It feels too much like a reunion for the sake of having a reunion. The Hellraiser series as a whole definitely hangs on the idea that death is far from permanent but bringing back characters again and again diminishes their impact. I think Clare Higgins had already done everything she could with the character of Julia in the first film, we didn't need to see her come back to torment Kirsty a second time (though interestingly, Barker actually thought Higgins should be the figure head for the series and tried to get her to come back for the third film).
Really,
if you think about it, Hellbound is much more of a gothic fantasy
adventure (with gore) rather than a straight-forward horror film and I
think that's the way you've got to approach it to really enjoy it. Yes,
it looks silly and will rarely scare you but everything moves at a fast
pace and doesn't leave you much time to think about it. I guess I've got
to offer the makers faint praise for not just rehashing the original
film and trying to make a continuation but they really shouldn't have
gone all the way to Hell. Overall, Hellbound is an okay-ish follow-up if viewed under these conditions.GRADE: B-
Hellraiser III: Hell on Earth (1992)The third film is usually always a difficult and tricky one for any franchise and Hellraiser III is no exception. In the intervening years between the second and third film, the original producers, New World Pictures, had closed and the rights were sold to Bob Weinstein's Dimension Films. At the time Dimension weren't the huge label they are today but still they decided to use their "influence" as producers over the film in order to try and make alterations to make the film more commercially successful than the previous one. This meant not only shooting it very cheap again (this time in the US instead of Britain) but also twisting the film's formula to better fit a horror film mould.
Hellraiser III
again picks up from the previous film, only this time it ditches
Kirsty in favour of a new protagonist, Joey (Terry Farrell), a TV
reporter who is investigating the mysterious death of man in a hospital
who seemed to be ripped apart by invisible chains. Meanwhile, the
mysterious pillar that was seen rising out of the mattress in the last
film has been mistaken for a piece of art and gets sold to Monroe, a
sleazy club owner who puts it in his apartment. Before long the pillar
comes to life and after devouring Monroe's latest girlfriend Pinhead
gets reborn from it, only this time something's different. He's no
longer reserved and stony-faced. He's now spouting one liners and
causing all kind of mayhem. Turns out when he died in the last film his
personality got split into the good and noble Captain Spencer and the
evil, sadistic Pinhead. Now it's up to Joey to send him back to hell.Clearly, the change in Pinhead was designed to give audiences a villain more in keeping with other franchises like Freddy Kruger and the Leprechaun. A wise-cracking bad guy who kills people in novel ways while spouting some witty one liners. Unfortunately, however much the film's storyline tries to justify the change (split personality, really?), it just doesn't work. It's too much of a shift. What made Pinhead truly terrifying in the original film was how emotionless he was. Having him say corny lines and smile significantly diminishes his presence. The big change is that Hellraiser III is really the film that bumps Pinhead up to being the major antagonist. When you think about it, he wasn't really the villain in either of the first two films.
Once again (in what will become a running theme in these Hellraiser
reviews), you've got to sit back and accept that the franchise has
evolved into something far sillier than the original film was in order
to enjoy it. And there are a few fun bits here and there such as the new
Cenobites that Pinhead creates are kind of enjoyable in a trashy way. The best being a
guy who fires CDs out of his body. And Pinhead walking into a church and
freaking out a priest was kind of cool. Unfortunately there's quite a lot
of dullness to wade through to get to these little bits. Much of it is
spent on Joey investigating Monroe's club and the puzzle box. At the
very least Hellbound had a sense
of pace, this film has none and when the action finally does kick in it's very lifeless.
It's a sad state of affairs that the major action set piece of the film is the Cenobites chasing Joey down an empty city street blowing up cars around her to scare her. Exploding cars aren't scary!The acting is pretty bad across the board. Terry Farrell is thoroughly wooden as Joey as is Paula Marshall who plays her sidekick Terri. Bradley does his best with the lines he's given but his Captain Spencer personality is very boring and Pinhead's spoiled (not least by the fact that they don't alter his voice to make it sound deeper). You know you're watching a bad film when plot exposition comes in the form of the lead character... having a dream. And the final battle in which Spencer and Pinhead re-merge is just a horrible cheap looking CGI effect and serves one of the lamest final battles I've seen in any film.
Overall,
Hellraiser III is a
pretty poor entry in the series (but we've got much lower to go). Even
as a trashy horror it consistently fails. It's doubly disappointing
because director Anthony Hickox's early film Waxwork,
a fun little b-movie, showed a lot of promise. I think if the film had
had a better director, who could give it a faster pace, the film could
have been a good guilty pleasure.GRADE: C+
NEXT TIME: Pinhead goes to Space and Beyond!
