Right let's start at the very beginning. Django
came out in 1966 and was a breakout success for both its Italian
director Sergio Corbucci and star Franco Nero. The film had an enormous
impact on the Spaghetti western scene with tons of directors attempted
to capture its look and feel for the next ten years. Django
was also something of a watershed moment for cinematic violence with
its ridiculously high body count and graphic gore (it was actually
banned in the UK right up until 1993!). If you're a fan of Robert Rodriguez or
Quentin Tarantino you need to see this film because both filmmakers owe a
great deal of debt to it.
The film's
plot sees Franco Nero play Django, a mysterious cowboy drifter who we
initially meet trudging through a bleak, muddy landscape, dragging a
coffin behind him. What's in the coffin? If you don't know, I'll leave
it as a surprise (here's a hint, it's not a body). Anyway at the
beginning of the film he rescues a prostitute called Maria from a group
of bandits and escorts her to a nearby town. He finds the place is
controlled by two warring factions. On the one side is the sadistic Major
Jackson and his
band of red masked former Yankee soldiers while on the
other side is the equally sadistic General Hugo and his group of Mexican
bandits. As Django wants revenge against Jackson he sides with Hugo and
his men and helps them steal a large quantity of gold from Jackson.
However it turns out Hugo has no intention of giving him his cut so
Django decides to team up with Maria to steal his share. Will they get
away it? Will Django get revenge on Jackson? What's in the coffin?
Even
watching this 46 years after it was made you can tell it's something
special. Django is such a fantastic protagonist - morally questionable,
unpredictable full of mystery - and he's played with perfect
precision by Nero and his steely blue eyes! I really enjoyed the fact
that Corbucci starts the film off by making Django seem to be an
indestuctible figure only to slowly strip him back until, by the end, he's
a shell of a man. I mean it's a tradition of story writing to give your
protagonist a difficult final fight but Django's is one of the bleakest,
most hopeless ones I've ever seen. A lot of people try and compare him
to Clint Eastwood's Man with No Name because they both are taciturn
anti-heroes but arguably Django's a far more tragic figure and much more
morally unbalanced.
Corbucci's film also has a very unique atmosphere. The muddy
landscape is highly evocative and stands in stark contrast to the
traditional dusty vistas of American westerns. That first shot of Django
really sets the tone for the rest of the film. He's literally dragging
death into town with him. There's also a great bit later on where someone asks him
what's in the coffin and he replies, with no hint of irony, "Django". Corbucci
portrays a very cynical and revisionist view of the Wild West. There's
no hint of "manifest destiny" or "the land of opportunity" only a
lawless place
populated by selfish characters who are obsessed with money and wealth.
It's hard to see it as anything less than a critique of American
capitalism.
The film is also rife with religious imagery which, given that Italy is a
heavily Catholic country, shouldn't come as too much of a surprise.
Throughout the film there's a fixation on crucifixes that culminates in
the final shootout in a cemetery; the character of Django on his knees,
hiding behind a tiny wooden gravestone while Jackson mockingly suggests
that he should start praying. Also earlier in the film, in it's most
infamous sequence, General Hugo discovers the town priest is a spy and
cuts off his ear and sadistically feeds it to him as punishment. I can't
help but feel these scenes are trying to either say God has abandoned
these people or, perhaps more controversially, religion is a falsehood that
we shouldn't try to hide behind. I don't know, maybe I'm reading too much into it.
Well, that's
enough philosophical analysis for one post. Overall Django is a fantastic movie. Okay, it's a little more cartoonish and more rough
around the edges than Leone's westerns but it's just as riverting to
watch and still feels surprisingly fresh. If you've never considered yourself a fan of westerns I strongly recommend checking this film out.
GRADE: A
All
this month I'm going to be reviewing a handful (or should that be fistful?) of Django movies in anticipation for Quentin Tarantino's new film Django Unchained.
As such I thought it would be a good idea to just have a little
introduction to the character to those that are unfamiliar with him.
The
character of Django originates from the 1966 Spaghetti western of the
same name directed by Sergio Corbucci. The film is about a mysterious
cowboy (played by Franco Nero) who comes to a frontier town, dragging a
coffin, and proceeds to get involved in helping a group of Mexican steal
a huge amount of gold from a sadistic army general and his men. It's a
bitter, bleak and very cynical movie that stands at
complete odds to the more polished and safe John Wayne movies of the
1940s.
The film was not only highly influenced (by Sergio Leone's A Fistful of Dollars) but also highly influential
in its own right and it's often reported that there were over 100
'unofficial' sequels made. The reality is that only about 30 can be
confirmed and almost all of these were movies that were inspired
by Corbucci's vicious western rather than direct continuations. In most
cases, these other 'Django' movies were original films that had the lead
character's name changed during the dubbed process to become Django. As
a consequence Django has his wife, brother and other family members
killed several times, in several different ways.
Still
the fact that these movies had character names changed in
post-production doesn't stop a lot of them from being very interesting
(and often very good) westerns. Obviously Tarantino's new film is going
to continue this tradition, in a very post-modern way, by having Jamie
Foxx's former slave character called Django. I'm happy to see him do
this as I think it will bring the character a lot of attention for
modern audiences and hopefully lead to more of these somewhat forgotten
films getting re-released on DVD.
Hope you enjoy the reviews.